|
Post by yulli on Sept 10, 2007 12:01:22 GMT 5.5
Reply to Sofiekh's opinion'
Hey! This is Yulli! You did a nice job though I think that your opinion should stand out. I felt that you didn't write very much about what your thoughts are for this current event and further more predictions. So yeah,,, though yours is really GOOOOD, ^^ just add your opinions and what you think will be the results for this current event. Then you'll be able to organize your ideas more affectively later on. Bye~~~
|
|
|
Post by pyeonchan on Sept 10, 2007 12:01:47 GMT 5.5
To sofie by rahel and yeonchan
I really like your prediction it is really funny how you compared us to grilled chicken.
|
|
|
Post by rikke on Sept 10, 2007 12:01:48 GMT 5.5
A replay to Sofiekb
In your current event, maybe you should have explain a little more about what happened in China, and what kind off things there did that they had so much pollution, and how the pollution had a big effect on the people. And instead of writing there were about 500 people dieing, you could have said how many in each year there died, and maybe also about how many there will die in the future each year if the don’t stop it. And another thing, in the current event, the tell a lot about how it is in United Stated, and Europe also, and comparing it to China, maybe you should have talked a little more about that. But other than that I think it was a interesting respond, and good.
|
|
|
Post by jayanth23 on Sept 10, 2007 12:02:29 GMT 5.5
Sam's article delt mainly with the general idea of the article. He never reached a core of what it was about. His Q&A was very good as it captured the asense of the article. He should use better words not like "flippin" or "hell" .. His indroduction was kind of vague because it sounded like a joke and this is a serious article. This is a profesional assignment. Overall this was a good summary of the article..
Jayanth and Sparsh
|
|
|
Post by sohee on Sept 10, 2007 12:02:50 GMT 5.5
Reply to Ye Eun's opinion
Ye Eun, I think your opinion is pretty similar with mine. Yes, I think the other countries have to help China too, because they are getting things from China which is necessary to them. But I also think China have to try much harder than the other countries help China. I surprised about your summary because you summarized the long article shortly with main ideas and I think you got most of the points.
|
|
|
Post by divya on Sept 10, 2007 12:03:18 GMT 5.5
Jayanth Your response contains a lot of research with actual relevant facts that deal with the article directly and indirectly. Maybe if you included more opinions in your response then we can understand what you think about the issue and comment on that. You included some but the more you include the more insightful your response will be. Other than that, it was in depth and made sense so keep up the good work! Eun Ju and Divya
|
|
|
Post by sujata on Sept 10, 2007 12:03:28 GMT 5.5
(Reply to Sparsh’s post)
(Hawk and Sujata) Sparsh’s post is interesting, but what we found that in many places he quoted the article. It is ok to quote the article, but considering we all read the article it would get pretty boring to re-read what we read. If he re-phrased it in his own words and opinion it would be a lot more interesting to read and wouldn’t loose the readers’ attention. He also claimed that China is technologically developed but from what we know China is still developing. Other than that it was interesting to read his opinions about this event.
|
|
|
Post by yeeun on Sept 10, 2007 12:03:29 GMT 5.5
Sparsh-
Yeah, I really agree with your question. Well, Sparsh, I think the reasosn they have not come up with a solution for enviroment is because they have a huge population. So I think they just have thought about the population problems. Well, but anyway, it is their responsibility too. Right?
It was a really good question thanks .!
|
|
|
Post by arpitav on Sept 10, 2007 12:04:27 GMT 5.5
Reply to sofiekh
I think you hit all the important points of the article well.
Also, I like the fact that you said “if China continues to do what they are doing now, it will hit the rest of the world, not just Asia”, because that is true. It is already starting to affect Los Angeles. I like your ideas but I think you should expand on them.
I especially like the way you made a comparison/contrast to the Europeans.
|
|
|
Post by miriam on Sept 10, 2007 12:04:36 GMT 5.5
|
|
|
Post by jihyeyun on Sept 10, 2007 12:04:48 GMT 5.5
Comment for rahel I agree with that lots of foreign countries came to China to expand or build up their business or factories because the price in China is cheaper. I also realized that even though China is big country, but having population problem. I think underlying cause of environmental problem is the size of population.
|
|
|
Post by sofiekh on Sept 10, 2007 12:06:49 GMT 5.5
To Sujata
You comment is very good and you are showing that china not can keep going with the thing they are doing now. You are writing very good and you make us understand how important it is for China to do something else than they are doing now
-sofie
|
|
|
Post by meehye on Sept 10, 2007 22:26:12 GMT 5.5
peoplerticle is about the China¡¯s developing environment problems. China is developing country. So she had many different kinds of factors and industries so lots of pollution appears in China. That Pollution made cancer so many people death because of pollution from factors. Chinese cities wrapped in a toxic gray shroud very often. The biggest environment cause is people¡¯s death. The diseases are most heart disease and lung cancer by air pollution. 300,000 people, while 60,000 died. People breathe air having dust, toxic and acid, lots of chemical things added on the air which is people breath. This article give this kinds of example ¡°a industrial cities where people rarely see the sun children killed or sickened by lead poisoning or other types of local pollution a coastline so swamped by algal red tides that large sections of the ocean no longer sustain marine life.¡± And then it became world¡¯s problems like acid rain on Seoul, South Korea, and Tokyo. Even Los Angeles attacks by pollution. So people want to find way that conquest these kinds happen.
I think it was really horrible situation. Nowadays, China become developing their country but they make big problems about pollution. This is horrible things because they cannot do anything about that and I think, they did not think about that point. When they develop their country, they should know about future happening. And suddenly they built lots of factories and make huge industry. That is why this kinds of happening. If these problems are happen only in China then they make decision more easily. For example, they work less then before like less fire gasoline-China fried gasoline more than before-the gasoline made huge air pollution and harmful to ozone. So they made decision for their country with developing. But, it became world¡¯s problems of pollution. So they only could do that they have to destroy their factories and then make less pollution.
Why they cannot think about future? Maybe, they have a lot of avarice about developing. So they did not care about their environment. I am not sure. Just I guess. And I think; now they have to care about their environment so they have to do something, not only developing. So what this article said they have to think about that what their problems are and what they can to do. Then they an success their developing their country without any pollutions. ;D
|
|